CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:07:37 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Most definitely so.  Try finding a small airplane in the sky on a 
perfectly clear day ...  your mind literally fills in the all the visual 
space with what it assumes is there.

More to the point, I think he forgot how many people didn't stop at stop 
signs fifty years ago either.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 3/21/2011 8:01 AM, Gerry Treas, K8GT wrote:
> Ahhh, but do you notice how many people DO stop at a stop sign?  Of course 
> not.  The human brain is wired to notice exceptions, not the commonplace.  
> Then, of course, we apply the exception as if it is the rule.
>
> Most people do abide by the rules, but who notices them?
>
> Sounds like the first caveman after we came out of the trees, "grumble. . 
> .don't know why we have to live in a cave, the trees were plenty good for our 
> ancestors.  Changes. . whole world is going to the dogs, if you ask me. . ."
>
> Thanks for claiming that I'm not honest.
>
> 73, Gerry, K8GT
>
>
>
>
> ---- somata90924@mypacks.net wrote:
>
> =============
> if people would be HONEST WE WOULD not have to be bothered by all 
> this,,skimmers,,internet, cheaters, SPOTS,,,,,bahhhhhh humbug.  Guess we have 
> lost that as a society, ever watch how many people never STOP at a STOP SIGN?
>
> joe w6vnr/zf2ah
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: burbidge terence<terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> Sent: Mar 18, 2011 7:21 AM
>> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
>>
>> <<I would describe recordings, whether of a whole
>> band or from individual stations, as technology
>> which inherently inhibits cheating, in contrast
>> to some other technologies which facilitate
>> cheating.>>
>> Great idea. Perhaps we could employ a firm of forensic experts to replay and
>> report on the recordings? Even simpler, let's set up a 'Star Chamber' of
>> distinguished contesters to investigate. Not just cheating but also
>> behaviour. For example, start/stop the clock when an SO2R/VFO leaves his run
>> frequency to make Q elsewhere and someone like me jumps in and steals it.
>>
>> Maybe take the Star Chamber findings to the International Court, complete
>> with the 'usual suspects' who could then be interrogated and eventually
>> tried for their offences.
>>
>> For goodness sake!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Terry
>> G4MKP
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>