CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

To: Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....
From: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 17:42:44 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The mults for the naqp are states.  I don't think Campbell, CA is a separate 
state from CA.

--
George Fremin III


On Dec 24, 2010, at 5:04 PM, Jack Brindle <jackbrindle@me.com> wrote:

> And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side 
> of things for a change...
> 
> Jack Brindle, W6FB
> 
> 
> On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
> 
>> Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a 
>> multiplier?  
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>