CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Now this is really unfair!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Now this is really unfair!
From: Ken McCormack <zl1aih@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:02:12 +1300
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ARRL 160M Contest 2010 -

QSO 2, Sections 1, Score 4 points.

Good signals from K9, N7, AD7, W7, K5,  W5, N6, WB9, N8 - no replies to my
calls between 0650 - 0800 UTC.

PJ2T and C6CU were loud here.

73, Ken ZL1AIH

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Bryon PAUL Veal n0ah <bryonveal@msn.com>wrote:

>
> On page 109 of CQ Magazine, in the December 2010 issue, W0ANT and I won our
> section for 2009's CQWW 160M SSB Multi-op with the second lowest score
> reported in this entire category in the world- - In fact, we were 550,000
> points lower than the highest USA score in this category by WE3C in PA-
> I've
> already gotten a place on the wall ready for the certificate.......However,
> the lowest winning score for their section was YE1ZAL with 78 points- That
> was for the entire Oceana area- I love getting certificates- and we really
> put in the time- but we only had 100 watts and a multiband 55 foot 30-160M
> sloper- I wonder what YE1ZAL was using? We've since upgraded our 160M
> station set up- but I have to grin about this one- I've already joked here
> locally about a trophy for "Our Max=Your Min" hihi
>
> 73  Paul  N0AH   (-:
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [CQ-Contest] Now this is really unfair!, Ken McCormack <=