OK Art, so let me see if I understand you correctly...
You're submitting your log, with some QSOS intentionally removed, because
someone who did not respond how you wanted them to, in order to
intentionally stick it to them ("I want them to suffer the penalty")?
Wow. I hope this doesn't catch on.
73,
Bob W5OV
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Art Boyars
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:26 PM
To: pvrc@mailman.qth.net; cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Keeping 'em honest
We had important out-of-town company thru the Thanksgiving weeked (until
Tuesday evening), so I did not get to make my trek to the W3LPL MM. All I
got to do was an hour or so of here-and-there demonstration QSOs ("This is
ham radio contesting"). CT says 49 QSOs, 18 Zones, 31 Countries, 6,566
Points. All S&P of the loud guys, except for a short attempt as a fresh
meat CQer on high up on 20M Sunday. That got me a Ukrainian and a VE1, who
I hope will remember me in SS CW :>).
I just submitted the log, not because my club will benefit from the points,
but because a couple of those big guns I worked did not, after a few
repeats, give me a clear indication that they copied my call/report. They
are not in my log, and I want them to suffer the penalty if they claim the
QSO.
I did work one USA station, a K1 who thought I was answering his CQ, when I
was actually calling the European right next to him. I hope the K1 keeps me
in his log.
73, Art K3KU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|