On 27/10/2010 13:27, Pete Smith wrote:
> I get the feeling that Paul's real objective here is to preclude remote
> operation.
Here is what I said in the context of an attempt to
define a boundary between SO and SO-Assisted that
would be both easily understood and unambiguous.
"... with my proposals anything is OK (any
technology whatsoever) within the own property/ 500 metre
limit so long as the only thing crossing the boundary of
the property is amateur band RF (corresponding to the
band(s) and mode(s) of entry).
I went on to say
"... Of course, this
property boundary concept immediately puts remote
operation into the assisted, if not extreme, class,
because there is more than amateur-band RF crossing
the boundary.
This definition, or distinction between unassisted and
assisted, precludes remote operation from unassisted
classes, which is not quite the same as precluding remote
operation.
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|