CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC

To: <rx99tx@gmail.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC
From: Denis Pochuev - K7GK <k7gk@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 21:45:32 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Number of received logs is just one measure of popularity. Another measure is 
the number of QSOs made by the leaders. And here RDXC lags quite a bit behind 
ARRL DX and WPX, even taking into account the difference in contest duration.

 

RDXC 2009 - 4Z5J M/2 - 3930 QSOs

ARRL DX SSB 2009 - 6Y1V M/2- 10164 QSOs

WPX SSB 2009 - CT9M M/2 - 6033 QSOs

 

73, Denis - K7GK
 
> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 07:17:04 +0600
> From: rx99tx@gmail.com
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC
> 
> Edward wrote:
> 
> E> True, its just that a lot of us don't like this game. While RDXC is
> E> popular, its not nearly as popular as CQWW ARRL DX and WPX, and if you look
> E> at the participation breakdown by region, its much less popular in the US
> E> and parts of Europe and Asia but helped out by the strong popularity by
> E> Eastern Europe and of course Russia.
> 
> Just a matter of time, Edward :) Comparing RDXC and the contests you
> mention, the RDXC sponsors receive as many logs as WPX and
> significally more than ARRL DX.
> 
> -- 
> RX9TX 
> http://rx9tx.qrz.ru

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your 
inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>