CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M
From: Art RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Reply-to: RX9TX <rx99tx@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 18:30:36 +0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Hello,

 Wonder why people can not just treat the rule as a part of a game? At
 the  same  time they understand that everyone is affected equally and
 the winners list will be just the same with or without the rule.

 de RX9TX

 DF3KV wrote:

 D> You just have to make sure the other operator logged what you transmitted

D> 73
D> Peter

D> -----Original Message-----
D> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
D> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of KL7RA

D> I have no control over what is logged by the other oper. The discussion on
D> this rule and the RDXC rules in general isn't necessary here as the final
D> order of finish will be the same with or without this rule, that is;
D> everyone treated equally unfair, but you have to draw the line somewhere and
D> this is mine.


D> _______________________________________________
D> CQ-Contest mailing list
D> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
D> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


-- 
 RX9TX 
 http://rx9tx.qrz.ru

 "It is easier to love humanity than to love your neighbor." [Eric Hoffer]      

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>