I know (or at least I have been informed) that people from CQ monitor
this board. but does the heads of ARRL contesting do it too? and what
are their thoughts on all these comments?
Joe WB9SBD
*The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle-Tyme.com
*
Edward wrote:
> What a poor idea this is guys. Not that of a rookie contest, that is
> noble. But to have a rookie contest that is so diconnected from normal
> contesting is illogical. Imagine a rookie comes over to a veteran
> contester's shack this weekend and asks about this log submittal and the
> 10 mins after the contest etc. The veteran says, huh? What are you
> talking about??
>
> I have never seen an attempt for the rookie version of something to be
> more challenging for scoring or timing than the "normal" version of
> something.
>
> What is the agenda here? If its truely a simple starter contest, make
> it truely simple. The same as existing contests. Submit your scores
> the way the big boys do..no faster than the big boys have to...and no
> more complicated than the big boys are required to.
>
> If its something else...air it out in the proper forum...don't slip it
> in for this new contest on people that don't know any better.
>
> Ed N1UR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2685 - Release Date: 02/13/10
> 02:43:00
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|