To: | "Doug Smith" <dougw9wi@gmail.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? |
From: | "Milt, N5IA" <n5ia@zia-connection.com> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2009 20:13:36 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> Nate Bargmann wrote: > Heck, I'd bet a pretty large proportion of the casual participants don't > even know their *four*-character square. However, I believe every QRZ lookup has the SIX character square listed. So, not very difficult to obtain. Mis dos centavos, Milt, N5IA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, David Kopacz |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Doug Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, k3bu |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, Shelby Summerville |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |