| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW (2pts analisys) |
| From: | "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si> |
| Date: | Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:53:36 +0100 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
KY1V wrote: The bottom line is that V47NT was the best operator and EF8M gets the plaque. I don't see fairness in that. EF8M repeated great 2008 DQ-ed score but this time G3SXW was behind him! I don't see fairness in that. Even with my OC YT1AD missing at K1LZ ☺ 73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] "Fair" in sports, kr2q |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?, w1md |
| Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] "Fair" in sports, kr2q |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Format of MASTER.DTA file?, kd4d |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |