CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they?
From: Julius Fazekas <phriendly1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 05:39:32 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Has WAE or any contest organization penalized folks for not following the IARU 
band plans?

Has there ever been any penalties levied against a contester by any official 
IARU organization?


Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en

Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875


--- On Wed, 12/2/09, VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk> wrote:

> From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] IARU band plans - just what are they?
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Wednesday, December 2, 2009, 10:04 AM
> A while back there was some
> discussion here about the IARU R1 band
> plan, as a result of DARC adopting the R1 band plan in the
> WAE rules.
> Here is a post to that thread by DL6KVA:
> 
> http://search.contesting.com/archives/html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00248.html
> 
> In the upcoming IARU R1 HF committee meeting, DARC has put
> forward a paper on band plans, which can be found here:
> 
> http://iaru-r1.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=173&func=download&id=294&chk=21d786e3ee7686357f4e705dec541e6b&no_html=1
> 
> In case that link doesn't work, try this: http://tinyurl.com/yf8l69w
> 
> In this paper, DARC seems to acknowledge that IARU band
> plans are
> just recommendations.
> 
> However, the IARU R1 band plan is now part of the WAE
> rules, so it is
> no longer just a recommendation.
> 
> And it is applied to all, not just R1.
> 
> Is there any other activity in amateur radio that has IARU
> band plans
> forced upon it like is being done to radiosport?
> 
> Introduction
> 
> The objective of the Cavtat recommendations CT08_C4_Rec_15
> and
> CT08_C4_Rec_16 is to leave parts of each HF band free of
> contest
> activity.
> 
> Background
> 
> Although the WARC bands are free of contests, they cannot
> serve in
> all circumstances the need of non-contesters (due to
> propagation, skip
> etc). The objective of contest preferred segments,
> established in the
> band plan in the mid-eighties, is to separate non-contest
> activity from
> contest activity. As the band plans are recommendations
> only, and
> some bands do not have contest preferred segments, contest
> organizers
> should be encouraged to include band sections to be used
> within the
> rules of the contest. This should be made with due
> consideration to the
> number of expected participants in the contest. DARC would
> like to see
> a detailed summary of the IARU Region 1 contests rules and
> start an
> exchange of experiences concerning this proposal.
> 
> Recommendation
> 
> That the HF Committee is analyzing the current situation.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>