CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules Question

To: "CQ Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules Question
From: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:10:13 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I was kind of surprised going through the rules as there used to be rule 
against such
activity if I recall correctly. I haven't paid much attention to rule 
changes in that area
though as I haven't worked at an MM or MS station in several years.

73, Larry  W6NWS
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ed K1EP" <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
To: <kr2q@optimum.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Rules Question


> At 10/23/2009 06:24 AM, kr2q@optimum.net wrote:
>>Q:I have a question regarding operators in the CQ WW contests.  Is
>>there any rule that prohibits
>>an operator from operating at a Multi Op station and also at his own
>>station with his own
>>call?
>>
>>A: There is no such limitation
>
> In that situation, I personally wouldn't work the MM from my own
> station to avoid any perceived impropriety.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>