CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Plans

To: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Plans
From: "Albert Crespo" <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Reply-to: Albert Crespo <f5vhj@orange.fr>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 14:04:46 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In Senegal, we are allowed to operate SSB from 7000 KHz to 7.1 KHz. The 
licensing authority has not yet allowed operation from 7.1 to 7.2 KHz.
73, Albert, 6W1RY
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andrei Stchislenok" <asnp3d@gmail.com>
To: "K1TTT" <K1TTT@arrl.net>
Cc: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Band Plans


>
> I was always wondering why many stations using 40 meters band working SSB 
> on
> or about 7.020 - 7.007 MHz for example? Regardless of geographical
> locations.
> As fas as I am aware, the *lowest frequency allowed for SSB mode is 7.040
> MHz* in all Countries, this is like a small segment of that so called
> "universal Plan"...
> Isn't this a reason to DQ such violators?
>
> 73's Andrei EW1AR-NP3D
>
> 2009/6/7 K1TTT <K1TTT@arrl.net>
>
>> Because each country can issue regulations that restrict frequencies and
>> modes differently.  Also, band plans are just that 'plans'... Plans can 
>> not
>> be reasonably expected to handle all circumstances.  For example, 
>> planning
>> for 20khz on 20m for FSK RTTY may handle normal weekday operating, but 
>> let
>> an expedition come on or a big rtty contest start up and 20khz just isn't
>> enough.  To expect operators to restrict themselves to the 'planned' 
>> 20khz
>> when there is lots of mostly unused spectrum on either side that they can
>> legally use is unreasonable.
>>
>>
>> David Robbins K1TTT
>> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
>> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
>> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Steve and Judy [mailto:hodgson@cytanet.com.cy]
>> > Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 06:42
>> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Band Plans
>> >
>> >
>> > Why do we not have a ''realistic'' Universal Band Plan ?
>> >
>> >
>> > 73 Steve  ZC4LI
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> 


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>