CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking

To: "'Randy Thompson K5ZD'" <k5zd@charter.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest Log Checking
From: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:48:48 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
...
>The RDXC committee mailed a UBN log checking report to every entrant.
I >had
>a much higher score reduction than I am normally used to so I studied
the
>file.
...
>I was very surprised to discover that I also lost credit for all QSOs
where
>the other station made a copying error.  
>
>19 stations busted my call:
...
>45 stations busted my number.  Many were off by only one digit, but
that's
enough to lose the QSO (and the mult).

...
>I am all for accuracy in contest exchanges.  Being sloppy should cost
points.  
...
>I will operate the RDXC seriously this year
...
>I plan to send slower
...
>and confirm that other stations copied my info correctly
...
>If you work me, please get it right!
...
>Randy, K5ZD

Also I was surprised about my UBN the first time I participated RDXC
some three or so years ago.

I challenged RDXC about the policy that if the other one does sloppy
copying, it costs me points.

However, they are right in the basic paradigm the exchange is not
complete until it is complete.

Furthermore, the rules are the same to everybody.


I will use RDXC to benchmark some features of my station for WPX SSB.
Hear you in RDXC.
.. and then WPX SSB.


73,
Jukka OH6LI


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>