CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs

To: <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs
From: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:36:54 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Dave,

Aside from seeing what time they were working stuff that you weren't, I
still remain skeptical that you have been able to leverage their experience
in any way from looking at their old log. 

I'm willing to listen to reason on this, but I still have not seen any
evidence that you can discern any secret techniques or methods by looking at
a log.

I suspect strongly that it is either propagation or operator skill in
handling pileups that makes the difference. Neither of those can be gained
from looking at an old log.

73,

Bob W5OV


-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of David Kopacz
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2008 4:59 PM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Public Logs

"I have yet to see any evidence that public logs compromise or reveal
any
"secret" techniques / methods or divulges anything anyone should want to
protect."


I beg to differ with you Bob. If you think we haven't been studying
PJ2T's logs at 6Y1V, you are sadly mistaken.

Sure, we have the hardware, but they have the experience. Now, so do we.

David ~ KY1V
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>