If you participate in a contest you are ipso-facto a contester. It's like
the old joke "now we're just dickering on the price".
73, de Hans, K0HB
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Tessmer" <mtessmer@mindspring.com>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 2:47 AM
To: <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>; <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
> And, as is always the case in discussions like this, the presumption that
> only contesters participate in contests.
>
>
> 73, Mike K9NW
>
>
> ---------------
> I abso-tively >>LOVE<< it Paul.
>
> No way for the receiver to get a good Q except to copy it in real time
> without any software crutch.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 4:34 PM
> To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Signal Report
>
>> Like I said before... What's wrong with a random number? Your logging
>> program issues one that you pass on to the other station and his does the
>> same for him to send to you. No more mindless 59 5 or enn e junk. No
>> prefilling of the exchange. You'd have to be able to pay as much
>> attention
>> in the 47th hour as you would in the 1st. Rates would drop but it'd also
>> be
>> more interesting.
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|