CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS
From: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:08:30 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree. That's the same as saying any section with more than, say, 25
operators in it should be considered worked by default. If everyone can get
a sweep, the contest becomes meaningless.

73 -- Paul VO1HE
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of K0HB
> Sent: December 4, 2008 23:48
> To: Leonard J. Umina; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS
> 
> > 
> > The ARRL could go a long way toward fixing this problem by making a 
> > minor change to the rules - if the section is not populated 
> enough to 
> > field at least 5 stations during a contest then it should not be 
> > necessary to work it.
> >
> 
> Such a rule would destroy SweepStakes.  
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>