To: | Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@pclink.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors |
From: | Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu> |
Date: | Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:58:07 -0700 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 12/1/2008 6:59 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC wrote: > When it becomes apparent you've been spotted wrong, besides laying on the > QSO B4 macro is there the option of simply QSYing 20 KHz and begin running > there? What are the trade-offs? Good luck finding a new frequency when 95% of the contesters are on 20 meters because 10 and 15 are closed. NO ONE wants to voluntarily give up a run frequency. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C/Ø, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW cw: it's 24 hours since the contest ended...did you submit your log?, Prasad |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] EZ4EBL, Ulli Grunow |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Spotting Errors, Paul J. Piercey |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |