CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000
From: "Michael Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:53:08 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe it wanted to see "1 KILO"? Beats me. I don't think you should have 
been dinged for 1KILO, but that's just my opinion.

73, Mike K9MI

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dick Williams" <dickwms@roadrunner.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 18:25
Subject: [CQ-Contest] 1 KILO vs. 1000


>I just looked at my Log Checking Report for his year's ARRL DX Contest,
> Phone.  I lost three QSO's for Incorrect Exchange Information, as shown
> below:
>
>
> *************** Incorrect Exchange Information ***************
> 14164   PH 2008-03-01  1325 W3OA NC EA1APV 1KILO correct 1000
> 14314   PH 2008-03-01  1611 W3OA NC 5Q1A   1KILO correct 1000
> 3771   PH 2008-03-02  0141 W3OA NC YV5LMW 1KILO correct 1000
>
> I thought 1000, KW, KILO, 1KW, 1KILO were all equal in the exchange
> entry.  Looks like I may be wrong.
>
> What is the accepted practice for logging such exchanges?  Is it the
> same for ARRL DX and CQWW contests?
>
> 73 - Dick, W3OA
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>