Yes Paul, criticism of public logs will continue. And the innocent will be
unjustly accused and forced unfairly to defend themselves.
The end result? Contesters will begin to wonder if it's worth the
aggravation.
Are we trying to promote contesting, or chase contesters away?
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]On Behalf Of Paul O'Kane
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 1:45 PM
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking in CQWW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Coslo" <mjc5@psu.edu>
> ... If sponsors had more people helping them, the results
> would be done more quickly, more accurately, and cheaters
> would be found and eliminated more easily.
"More people" may be a red herring. CQ already has
software that provides every entrant with a detailed
UBN report.
The same QSO database, together with the corresponding
spots data, can be used to identify entrants who, based
on averages and other parameters yet to be agreed, "bend"
the rules.
Public logs provide ammunition for anyone who, rightly
or wrongly, believes the logs identify some cheaters.
Criticism of individual logs will continue unless
contest sponsors are seen to make reasonable eforts
to enforce all their own rules.
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|