CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies...

To: Yuri VE3DZ <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] More CQWW anomalies...
From: Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:27:46 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Yuri VE3DZ a écrit :

> The call that was used in the contest is DK1F(see header of the LOG).
> However, in Cabrillo file there is DL9LR call everywhere... That means NILs 
> for all who worked him...

No ! (i worked DK1F and didn't get a NIL)

Only the CALLSIGN header field is taken into account by the robot.

- If we have DL9LR in all QSO lines, but DK1F in the header, those who 
logged DK1F will be OK.
- If we have UN7MMMM in the header, those who logged UN7MMM will receive 
a NIL, even if all QSO lines say UN7MMM in his log.

Laurent, F1JKJ


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>