To: | "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>, "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A) |
From: | "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | k-zero-hb@earthlink.net |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:04:08 -0000 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > Right now this > is a unique opportunity for cw operators and contesters to show that new > technology can make cw contesting interesting, even if you can't decode it > by ear. > > David Robbins K1TTT > David, That is a persuasive argument for the use of Skimmer. I find myself in agreement with it. But you didn't make ANY argument which persuades me that it belongs in SOA-Classic. If you need assistance copying Morse, what better class than the assisted class? 73, de Hans, K0HB _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment, David Robbins K1TTT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word!, VR2BrettGraham |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A), David Robbins K1TTT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A), David Robbins K1TTT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |