| To: | "'CQ-Contest Reflector'" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word! |
| From: | "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:58:55 -0600 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> I've made that suggestion numerous times. If you can't define it, get rid > of > it. Seems simple enough to me. A corollary: If you don't have a method for detecting the use of a technology then don't rule on it until you do. ... Sylvan Sylvan Katz, VE5ZX Saskatoon, SK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Participation (U vs A), David Robbins K1TTT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment, David Robbins K1TTT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word!, Paul J. Piercey |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Remove that Word!, N7mal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |