| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 schedule conflict |
|---|---|
| From: | "John T. Laney III" <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
| Date: | Sun, 04 May 2008 21:25:48 -0400 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I think the ARRL and CQ should get togther and use one or both of the split weekends and avoid the conflicts altogether. NAQP RTTY and ARRL DX CW will be totally incompatible after 20Z or so on 40M at least and maybe on other bands. CQ 160 SSB and ARRL DX CW would make 160M a non band in ARRL DX CW because the SSB stations will not stay high in the band and they will wipe out weak DX stations. 73, John, K4BAI. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] Visalia Contest Dinner - thanks and a reminder, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Thanks for the Q, Dale Putnam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 2009 schedule conflict, John Geiger |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] New Remote Operating Reflector, Paul Mackanos - K2DB |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |