CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along

To: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimming Along
From: DL8MBS <prickler.schneider@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 07:48:30 +0200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Michael Coslo wrote:

>Well, I'm not betting, but robots exist already. All it takes is some  
>Digital handshaking, and the QSO is made. It would be pretty silly to  
>contest that way though. 
>
Please, why would it be silly?
It is only in the logic of tech development (with all the fine 
enthusiasm already at work in engineering skimmer setups quality will 
improve very quickly).

All of us insisting here that there should be a remarkable "human" 
element in contesting are told that it is a tech hobby. I can only refer 
again to sailing sports where they are so evil to "freeze" technology 
not allowing engines in their sailboat categories and marathon runners 
being so evil to still not allow wheel chairs with engines in the 
regular runner´s categories.
Are they all "Amish"-like people?

Best 73, Chris

(www.dl8mbs.de)


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>