To: | CQ Contest Reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER |
From: | Dave Lawley <dave@g4buo.com> |
Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:38:36 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> ....... To deny those who > lack your particular skill set and dedication the ability > to participate in a significant portion of contests would > go a long way toward hastening the demise of contesting - > at least CW contesting. No, Joe. Turning it into just another datamode will hasten the demise of CW contesting. Dave G4BUO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Zack Widup |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Ken Claerbout |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Skimmer - a sterile debate?, don . field |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER, David Robbins K1TTT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |