CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:34:33 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Stan,

I believe many have already made a compelling case that there is no such a 
thing as unassisted anymore- we all use some sort of automation to achieve 
competitive advantage- keyers, computer logging, auto-tune amplifiers, etc. Why 
only focus on Skimmer or DX clusters?

If we examine the type of contesters who may use such aids, we will find out 
that they already have a decent station that can support rapid band changes; 
otherwise the extra multiplier will not be worth the lost QSOs on the current 
band due to antenna switching, PA tuning, etc.  However, well equipped stations 
will always outperform "basic" stations and, therefore, the assisted category 
does not offer any relief to the "basic" stations.  Just think about it- if I 
wanted to take advantage of Skimmer, I would need at least a SO2R set-up and a 
SDR, which already assumes a better equipped station; do you really think that 
adding Skimmer to the station is going to significantly impact my competitive 
advantage?

At the end of the day, winning a contest takes maximum efforts in station and 
antenna engineering, operating strategy planning and execution, skills, and 
stamina.  The SO1R vs SO2R debate is perhaps a better way to address the 
difference in station equipment and its impact on contest categories.

Rudy N2WQ

Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net> wrote:  Rudy N2WQ Wrote:
>  As long as it is not robots making 
> the QSO and station 
> transmitter/receiver are not scattered 
> across the globe, let the humans use 
> as much technology as they can.

Now we have something to talk about.... 
How do you propose eliminating that 
next, rather easy step up from Skimmer - 
Robotic Automated QSO machines?

It is refreshing to find that seemingly 
someone who is questioning whether there 
should be a category to differentiate 
between someone who is working the 
contest with his own skills versus using 
a computer to tell him what stations are 
active, what frequency they are 
operating on, what they are sending, 
etc. would perhaps  want to draw a line 
in the sand before the whole thing is 
turned into a computer game...

I assumed everyone who wanted to allow 
Skimmer in the unassisted category or 
wanted to diminish the whole sport by 
eliminating the number one category of 
entry would also welcome the next 
logical step which would be to replace 
the operator with machines to 
automatically make the QSOs and log them 
for you.

Stan, K5GO 


 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>