CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

from [Tom Osborne] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:12:09 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Unless, of course, the guy using Skimmer can only copy 10 WPM and the 
Skimmer is showing stations sending 35 WPM that there is no way he could 
ever copy by ear.  That is definately assistance.  73
Tom W7WHY


>
> Skimmer doesn't do anything that the operator can't do (the
> operator can scan the band and copy every signal he encounters)
> but skimmer does it faster and more efficiently but with less
> accuracy. 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, Dick-w0raa
Next by Date:  Re: [CQ-Contest] wideband receivers and contesting, Tod -ID
Previous by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] SKIMMER = BUMMER, Doug Renwick
Next by Thread:  Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer, K0HB
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]