CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: "Leigh S. Jones, KR6X" <kr6x@kr6x.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:42:17 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
To the degree that this is true, so might a receiver; it's only necessary
that the receiver output be stored. yet no one is seriously suggesting 
that a receiver should be disallowed.


From: AB7E
> With all due respect, I don't believe that is true.  Skimmer 
> time-shifts.  All of the other things you mention require that the 
> operator actually be in the chair to take advantage of them.  Skimmer, 
> even a local-only one, does not.  It very effectively performs its 
> intended function even if the operator is taking a nap.
> 
> Dave   AB7E
> 
> 
> Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
>> CW Skimmer is a new application of existing technology (CW decoders, 
>> broadband receivers, panadapters, additional receiver, etc.) that 
>> allows an operator to be more productive IN ANOTHER AREA of the 
>> contest art.  Other than the manner of presentation it breaks no 
>> new ground. 
>>
>> A local Skimmer is to CW Decoders and SOnR as computer logging 
>> is to the paper logs and dupe sheet.  It breaks no new ground 
>> in function ... only in form.  
>>
>>
>>
>>   
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>