CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: rt_clay@bellsouth.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: w5ov@w5ov.com
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 19:29:20 -0400 (EDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Tor,

What you describe is SO2R - not assistance.

If you listen to 10 receivers yourself, you are doing it.

73,

Bob W5OV




>
>> Using Skimmer would not be cheating, but it clearly is assistance.
>>
>> The CQWW rules are quite clear when it says "The use of DX alerting
>> assistance of any kind places the station in the Single Operator
>> Assisted
>> Category".
>>
>> It does not specify that the assistance has to come from another
>> "person".
>
> Bogus argument.
>
> If I park a 2nd receiver on another band while calling cq on band #1
> (standard
> SO2R) that clearly gives me  "DX alerting assistance" of  another kind as
> well.
>
> They clearly mean from other operators.
>
> Tor
> N4OGW
>
>   _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>