To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges |
From: | "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz@aspwebhosting.com> |
Date: | Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:53:38 -0500 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>If we're eliminating useless information in exchanges, should we do >the same for zones in CQWW and IARU? All the software knows what zone >you're in. I disagree. I am surprised at the number of operators that have come to 6Y1V and INCORRECTLY accepted the default zone for stations that were actually giving a different zone than what the software provided. I always log what I hear and never what the software tells me. David ~ KY1V _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Lightning Protection, Greg Becker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no), Peter Voelpel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, Paul Jones |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper WPX Exchanges, AD5VJ Bob |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |