To: | "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules |
From: | "Colleen Brakob" <cbrakob@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | cbrakob@earthlink.net |
Date: | Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:12:03 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> > Maybe we should be talking about an entirely new class structure for > single-ops -- something like "Advanced" and "Traditional". Or maybe three > levels - "Traditional", "Advanced" and "Unlimited". > I second the motion. I have no objection to "skimmers" competing with "skimmers", but I object to "skimmers" competing with "radiomen". 73, de Hans, K0HB/W7 "Just a boy and his radios" _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Expansion of Skimmer Subject, Colleen Brakob |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Expansion of Skimmer Subject, Colleen Brakob |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmers and Rules, Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPX and 30 Hour Nonsense, Robert Shohet |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |