| To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations | 
| From: | Richard Detweiler <rdetweil@hotmail.com> | 
| Date: | Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:08:32 -0500 | 
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> | 
Dave, K1TTT said "should be given their own operating class and awarded bonus points or granted special multiplier status to encourage development of the technology!" I like the way this guy thinks! A romote station could not possibly keep up with a local operator with today's technology. But who knows, someday, it might be faster... Best WishesRichard K5SF谢谢 理查 _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations, David Robbins K1TTT | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer test to shut down, Marijan Miletic | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations, David Robbins K1TTT | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations, Paul O'Kane | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |