To: | CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse |
From: | Laurent Ferracci <laurent@ferracci.org> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:32:01 +0100 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Scott Robbins a écrit : > None of those examples you provide (memory keyers, mechanical pencils, digital > signal processing) provides me with DX altering assistance. A piece of > software that tells me the callsign and the frequency of a CW signal DOES. Let's consider an IC-7800 or FTDX9000. They show you a "peak" on their 2nd receiver, and they can decode it to tell you whose signal it is. In short, they can tell you the callsign and the frequency... (BTW i noticed an interesting lapsus when you wrote "DX altering assistance") -- Laurent Ferracci, F1JKJ Blog radio: http://www.ferracci.org _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CWSkimmeruse, Mark |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (was: Cheating with Technology), Robert Chudek - K0RC |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CW Skimmeruse, Scott Robbins |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dead horse: CQ WW rules apparently prohibit CWSkimmeruse, Doug Renwick |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |