To: | "Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise |
From: | "VE5ZX" <ve5zx@hotmail.com> |
Date: | Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:23:51 -0600 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> The contest sponsors could omit the logs from the same entities. Or they > could just remove the timestamps. This is not a viable option. Tampering with the logs in any manner reduces or completely eliminates their usefulness for research or for the development of new adjudication software tools. Best to leave the open logs alone and let the DXCC folks figure out a new way to handle any problem that may exist in another way. Sylvan Katz - VE5ZX Saskatoon, SK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, Glenn VA3DX |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, David Robbins K1TTT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, Glenn VA3DX |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL rule - A practical compromise, David Robbins K1TTT |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |