CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections

To: "cq-contest reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>,"Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>, <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections
From: "Fred Dennin" <fdennin@numail.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:29:15 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It might work out for you but it's a pain in the posterior to the guy who 
has a run going and gets his rhythm interrupted because he has to wait on an 
SO2R guy that hasn't yet mastered handling both rigs.  When I acknowledge 
your call and you don't come back right away in my run, you're written off 
and I'm CQing again.  When you get around to logging your other Q and call 
me again, you move to the bottom of the list for a response from me.

Everyone has to have a transition period in mastering handling two radios 
simultaneously, and my hat goes off to those who do it very well because 
there is an art to it.  Good luck with your endeavor in doing so as well!

73'....Fred WW4LL


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <steve.root@culligan4water.com>
To: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>; "cq-contest reflector" 
<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY Reflections


> >Here's a question for you, though. Why are you waiting 20
>>seconds between cq's?
>>
>>Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
>>Yuma, AZ
>>
>
> Because I was working a guy on the second radio at the time and heard the 
> answer to my CQ in the other ear! Actually the timing works out pretty 
> good in such a circumstance as I was able to interleave both QSO's pretty 
> well.
> 73 SR
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>