Yeah, what Jim said!
There are lots of us out here who genuinely are UNASSISTED. I never log on
the internet, telnet, or whatever during a contest, never will. I do not
want to be lumped in with the ASSISTED just in case I might be a cheater.
Very 73,
Rusty, na5tr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
To: "CQ-Contest@contesting. com" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SPOTTING AD NAUSEUM
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
>
>
>> Reality Show. Packet and spotting is here to stay. I believe
>> that ASSISTED / NON-ASSISTED should be lumped into one category.
>> If you think spotting helps, use it. At least then the (too
>> many) Assisted Cheaters can then use it without being dishonest.
>
> Here's a parallel argument - I don't support it either :-)
>
> Reality Show. Amplifiers are here to stay. I believe that
> HP/LP/QRP should be lumped into one category. If you think
> power helps, use it. At least then the (too many) Power
> Cheaters can then use it without being dishonest.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|