To: | "Kevin J. Rowett" <kevin@rowett.org> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to Cabrillo Robot Authors [wasAnOpportunity for Cabrillo Improvement] |
From: | Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> |
Date: | Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:38:48 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:45 PM, Kevin J. Rowett wrote: >> Robot authors, please seriously re-examine the way that QSO: >> data is parsed. > > Be conservative in what you send/emit, liberal in what you accept/ > parse. That is not what John meant when he made that (somewhat apocryphal) statement you paraphrase. "Be liberal" meant "do not drop core or crash in the presence of bad data." It never meant "accept and try to intuit the intent of the author when presented with nonsense." --lyndon _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] NCCC Thursday Night Practice Party January 4 - NSrules, CW, 30 Minutes!, Ken Keeler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Amplified headphones, Tom Osborne |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] An Open Letter to Cabrillo Robot Authors [wasAnOpportunity for Cabrillo Improvement], Kevin J. Rowett |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] cut numbers, Dennis OConnor |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |