To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Assisted Low Power? |
From: | "Jamie Dupree NS3T" <ns3t@arrl.net> |
Reply-to: | Jamie Dupree NS3T <ns3t@arrl.net> |
Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:37:52 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Actually Steve - I would like to see just one single op category... assisted and unassisted lumped together. But... My argument is this - if so many people are so hotly opposed to the idea of mixing them - then why not have a separate category for low power assisted. Those are the people who are getting the shaft in the current contest setup more than anyone. Spots do them no good at all if they are forced to compete against the big power guys. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency, Tree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] The Unassisted Myth - Now the Rest of the Story:The Assisted Myth (?), Steve London |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] QSX frequency, Tree |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Cleveland Contest Convention, Jimk8mr |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |