CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Single-op assisted versus unassisted

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Single-op assisted versus unassisted
From: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:48:15 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Tree, I must disagree.  The facts and figures from contests don't support your
> claim that assisted ops routinely have higher scores.
> 
> UN-assisted operators typically score BETTER - not worse than assisted.
> The UN-assisted don't win everytime - but they come very close.
> 
> Just look at the top claimed scores on 3830 from the major contests in 2006:

Perhaps I typed un when I shouldn't have.  I was never trying to say that 
assisted
scores are higher than unassisted.  I was trying to explain why that was the 
case.

This is what I said:

> The reason that you see typically lower un-assisted scores at the top is
> simple.  The large percentage of the top operators are NOT using assistance. 

You are right - I mistyped.  This should say "lower assisted scores".  

Sorry about that.   Thanks for catching it.

Whomever made U the precedence for assisted is to blame - ain't my fault.  :-)

Tree
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Single-op assisted versus unassisted, Tree <=