CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance

To: <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>,"Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance
From: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:06:52 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Hans,

I agree that directional CQs are a legitimate tool. However, given the
recent discussion and the pervasive use of packet, it appears to be, by
many, considered to be equivalent to using packet, because of the
significantly increased probability that someone will bestow a "random act
of kindness" on the CQer. That is why I included it in my "Gentlemen's
Agreement."

73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>