To: | <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>,"Cq-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance |
From: | "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net> |
Date: | Wed, 06 Dec 2006 18:06:52 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Hi Hans, I agree that directional CQs are a legitimate tool. However, given the recent discussion and the pervasive use of packet, it appears to be, by many, considered to be equivalent to using packet, because of the significantly increased probability that someone will bestow a "random act of kindness" on the CQer. That is why I included it in my "Gentlemen's Agreement." 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance, TED |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance, Richard DiDonna NN3W |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance, K0HB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance, K0HB |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |