John,
I saw in a note (I think from PY5EG) that this breakdown was based on
raw numbers from the logs (except for the gross unique problem mentioned
elsewhere) prior to checking, so its not at all unreasonable the seven
station might have busted somebody's callsign to look like yours.
Dave/K8CC
John E Bastin wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 10:35 AM, py5eg@iesa.com.br wrote:
>
>
>> Dear WRTC2006 friends:
>>
>> Following the post contest information, we are glad to share with
>> you some
>> analyses made by W5GN Barry regarding the non WRTC2006 participants.
>> We kindly invite you to take a good look on our RELEASE O68/06
>> http://www.wrtc2006.com/release68.html
>> Thanks for supporting WRTC2006
>> Oms PY5EG
>>
>
> It's interesting that the listing shows my total QSOs with WRTC
> stations as 71, also shows 71 contacts in the CW column, and then
> shows 7 contacts in the phone column(??) (I was a CW-only entrant in
> IARU). Looking over the listing in just the area of my call, I see a
> number of other calls that have the same number in "Total" and "CW"
> and then some additional number in the "Phone" column.
>
> Might want to take another look at this analysis...
>
> 73,
>
>
> John E Bastin, K8AJS
> jbastin@sssnet.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|