> We are not talking about the "feature" of unclaiming QSOs in one of the
> loggers are we?
That is exactly what is being suggested, that a multi-single be able to
make a QSO and not take point credit
I don't think this is possible with any of the logging programs I've used
NA CT N1MM to name 3 .
It the Multi-single is operating within the rules this should not be
necessary and the poor guy who works him
doesn't get the Q scrubbed from the MS log because rules were not followed.
Quack
----- Original Message -----
From: "VE3FH [R]" <ve3fh@rac.ca>
To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
> Good question, I would like to know that too. The revision history
> (http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/updates.txt) mentions a request to
> support unclaimed QSOs but it looks like is not part of the current specs:
>
> "2002-10-15 Unclaimed QSO support requested by DL6RAI and DL8WPX/YB1AQS
> but
> deferred until XML version of Cabrillo."
>
> We are not talking about the "feature" of unclaiming QSOs in one of the
> loggers are we?
>
> 73,
> Julio VE3FH
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
> To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wed 26-Jul-2006 18:28
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
>
>
>> How do you 'zero point' a contact in a Cabrillo log?
>>
>>
>> David Robbins K1TTT
>> e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
>> web: http://www.k1ttt.net
>> AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
>> > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Gord Kosmenko
>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 18:22
>> > To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>> > Subject: [CQ-Contest] Cheating by M/S - 3 QSO "penalty" by K3BU
>> >
>> >
>> > There is a solution or fix to this situation, as an active M/S we
> practice
>> > the following,
>> > if the op violates the 10 minute rule by working any station, we "zero
>> > point" the QSO.
>> > The contact still reminds in the log - for log checking purposes.
>> > Especially for the
>> > other guy not to get a "not-in-the-log" action by the checkers.
>> >
>> > There are solutions to many of the logging problems discussed lately
> which
>> > can be
>> > solved or handled by operator contest knowledge, experience and
> expertise.
>> >
>> > 73, Gord VE6SV
>> >
>> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/399 - Release Date: 7/25/2006
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|