Yes, as I wrote, on the low bands they are more valuable because there are
generally less qso points.
On the high bands while working DLs they can´t work 3 and 5-pointers.
If you take away a total of 5000 DL qsos, probably 10% of the final result
is lost, which then is still >21 millions points.
Assume instead working 5000 DLs, 2000? more 3 and 5 point contacts during
the same operating time would be of better value ;-)
That?s what I meant by not to overrate the national contacts
73
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Marijan Miletic
Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 00:22
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it a time to change rules for HQ stns in
DF3KV wrote:
The low bands are a bit different there they are more valuable.
Don´t overrate the value of calls with the own country for the final result.
These are this year 3830 data for 160 m EU and NA HQ. No overrating, please
:-)
T90HQ 160: 213 24 33
OE1A 160: 400 503 38
OM6HQ 160: 424 358 39
4N9HQ 160: 428 265 39
OL4HQ 160: 440 277 40
OP0HQ 160: 470 196 46
DA0HQ 160: 1199 1205 42
VA3RAC 160: 154 0 9
NU1AW 160: 256 155 19
W1AW 160: 266 112 14
73 de Mario, S56A, N1YU
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|