To: | <w3dq@arrl.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes/NIL and Scoring? |
From: | "Stuart Santelmann KC1F" <kc1f@adelphia.net> |
Date: | Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:35:03 -0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
> My question: Should I assume the log checkers will deduct points for the > initial NIL and then accept the good QSO? > > If the answer is to the above is YES, it becomes the justification to > just work 'em, even if you *think* they're dupes. > Hi Eric: Yeah, just work them - you don't have to worry about being "DQed" ! (sorry, couldn't resist...) Stu KC1F _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes/NIL and Scoring?, Milt Jensen |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] Working dupes, Tree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes/NIL and Scoring?, Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes/NIL and Scoring?, Eric Rosenberg W3DQ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |