Zig,
I disagree - in today's society it is very important that we are all
winners. There can be no losers. Since I can place well in the pack but
never win with the current set of rules, I would propose the suggested
classification:
Proposed Entry Class:
Low power, 2 verticals 75 feet 6 inches apart operated by a middle aged,
overweight, graying grandfather of three. Did I mention ex-boy scout...
Maybe now I will have a chance to win. After all, it not about improving
your skill to be the best operator you can be - it is about winning. :)
Respectfully,
Pat
WW9R
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of S. Markowski Jr.
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 10:23 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] NAQP.......
All these SUGGESTED class changes, all these different angles on how to
interpret the rules to suit one's self needs /wants... even when WE ALL
know what the spirit of the language SUGGESTED meant......
Why don't we JUST LEAVE IT THE WAY IT IS.............
73,
Zig - KM9M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|