To: | <cq-contest@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"?? |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:07:08 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 07:30 PM 1/25/2006, John Geiger (NE0P) wrote: >Wouldn't a single element wire also include a rhombic? > >73s John NE0P ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It sure would. This shows how carefully things have to be worded when making rules. Perhaps stating the gain equivalent would be better, i.e. "An antenna with gain equivalent to a half-wave dipole or a 1/4 wave vertical worked against ground". 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] [DX-NEWS] LotW Support by ARRL Officials &Officers..., Dick Green WC1M |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] CQ Italy - 2x1 and special calls, VE5ZX |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"??, W4ZW |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] New category: "Wires only"??, Joe Subich, W4TV |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |