| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS? |
| From: | Cqtestk4xs@aol.com |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:54:12 EST |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
Others may go there, but in FL....no way. If I have to go on 160, it's time to shut it down and save the operating time for the next morning. Bill K4XS _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions, Michael Tope |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC - An Objective Selection Criterion?, Cqtestk4xs |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?, Bill Coleman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS?, Richard DiDonna NN3W |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |