Has the OO program improved?? Who is training and certifying OOs?? In a
previous life, (in other words - long long ago), I was appointed an OO via
the ARRL. What this meant was I received a stack of cards sent from ARRL
that I could use to fill out and send to "violators". Did I receive any
training to determine what a violation was? No, however, I will say that
the people who were OO's, seemed to be knowledgeable from operating and
participating in various activities. However, we did not have any contact
or affiliation with the FCC.
I also received a nice certificate to hang on the wall. AND I got to use
the appointment to participate in CD contest parties (now you know how long
ago).
Unless things are very different in modern time, OO appointees will be
ineffective in solving this situation.
73
Red K0LUZ
-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of AD5VJ Bob
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:47 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reporting Jammers to the FCC
Before doing that you might want to read this first:
http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/org/am_aux.html
Q. What is the Amateur Auxiliary?
A. The Amateur Auxiliary is composed of approximately 700 ARRL
volunteer-appointees, known as "Official Observers"
or "OOs," across the country who monitor the bands and notify amateurs of
technical and operating discrepancies as a service to their fellow hams. OOs
are helper-advisors, not "band cops." In cases involving serious rule
violations such as malicious interference, however, they are trained and
certified to gather and forward evidence that can be used by the FCC in
enforcement actions.
The program is based on a formal agreement between the FCC and the ARRL.
73 fer nw,
Bob AD5VJ
10X# 37210, FP#-1141, SMIRK#-5177
http://www.n5iet.com/
Code may be taking a back seat for now,
but the pioneering spirit that put the code there in the first place is out
front of it all.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Mike Fatchett
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 10:23 AM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Reporting Jammers to the FCC
>
>
> I received an email from the FCC.
>
> If you would like to file a complaint against the AD5
Jammer
> or anyone else you need to file a written, signed
statement
> of the facts and fax it to the FCC, Riley Hollingsworth
717-338-2574.
>
> Mike W0MU
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|