| To: | "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>, <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>,"Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion? |
| From: | "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net> |
| Date: | Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:35:23 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
>Bill, we've disagreed on this before, but if the best operators say the >advantage is maybe 95 QSOs out of 1200, is it that huge? > >73, kelly >ve4xt In Sweepstakes, absolutely. Especially when everybody has 80 mults. Not that I disagree with SO2R, but I do disagree with your point. 73 Rich NN3W _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R trick, PaulKB8N |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Competitor Friendly Contesting, Tom McAlee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Randy Thompson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R -- revised opinion?, Kelly Taylor |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |